The Waning Moon

Posted by Sean McCormack (Galway, Ireland) on 6 January 2010 in Plant & Nature.

After a frantic search on the day of the Lunar Eclipse, I had to give up on ever finding my camera adaptor for the telescope. I've a cheap Meade ETX-70, which is a 70mm refractor, for those that might be interested. I bought it in Lidl I think. Of course, when I had no need of it, I found the adaptor in a casual search. When I got home from work on Monday morning (4am or so), I took it out for a go. I spent the best part of an hour trying to get the largest image I could onto the sensor.

I eventually found that inverting my 12mm eyepiece inside the camera adaptor barrell produced the largest image. The shot above is the uncropped frame from the camera.

Of course, all is not rosy. The shot is at ISO1600 and at 1/400sec. Despite the EXIF thinking it's 50mm, it's actually 350mm @f5. Hence needing such a speed for camera shake. The full size shot is far from perfect. There's heavy blue fringing, it's noisy and a tad soft. The reduction process has sharpened it, and so it looks okay at this size. I'm presenting here because it's simply a record shot of my first camera scope session. I should note that I've still had to add about 2 stops of exposure and some brightness to the image also. There's also the small matter of the black and white conversion to finally remove the blue fringe.

Astrophotography isn't in my list of skills by any mean stretch, but I've always had an interest in Astronomy, so it is an interesting marriage of things I like.

Stephen Holmes from Dublin, Ireland

Excellent technique and a super result. There's still a tonne of detail in there to see. Intriguing setup :-)

6 Jan 2010 9:27am

Jason Kravitz from Brussels, Belgium

nice result and great detail - thanks for the explanation

6 Jan 2010 5:40pm

kate from lincolnshire, United Kingdom

~~`stunning~~

6 Jan 2010 6:26pm

Curly from South Shields, United Kingdom

It's an incredibly good detailed shot Sean, don't know what your longest focal length (on the camera body) is, but you should be able to do a picture like this without to much bother, admittedly it would not be full frame. This was mine at the far end of my Tamron 75 - 300mm.

6 Jan 2010 7:13pm

@Curly: Hi Curly,
My first image here (on the 1st) was taken with a 50-500 and a 2X, giving 1000mm, which fills roughly about half the frame. Shooting through a telescope is a completely different beast, as I found out. The combination of the eyepiece and the focal length give the actual magnification, allowing you to get much closer and fill the frame. I also have a 4mm, so I could easily shoot craters on the moon itself, something not possible with straight lenses.

The problem seems to be that although the scope is rated at f5, introducing the eyepiece reduces the light level. I'm sure I'll work it all out in time.

elmer from France

good evening. impressive! I want more.

6 Jan 2010 8:50pm

Michael from Shell Village, United Kingdom

Fantastic shot with lot's of detail, it's a great result. I've been thinking about getting a telescope, but the choice is many and choosing the right one isn't easy. I managed this with my 300mm zoom lens, but I find the Moon not always easy to photograph.

7 Jan 2010 4:09am

@Michael: My choice was easy.. it was the right price with a lot of accessories! Basically Lidl were selling them for €180, so I bought it. Scope, tripod, motor mount, 3 eyepieces, 3X, Right angle prism. Basically anything you might need as a beginner. They had a much better one for €300, but that was beyond the budget. I knew Meade to be a well known brand, so I had no fear of it not working.

Canon EOS 5D Mark II
1/400 second
ISO 1600
50 mm

waning
moon
lunar
telescope

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on StumbleUpon